In the intersection of consumer protection and industry responsibility, few events draw attention quite like product recalls and the legal battles that follow. The Exactech lawsuit stands as a poignant example of this dynamic interplay.

The lawsuit emphasizes the complexities of holding manufacturers accountable for alleged product defects. As we delve into product recalls and legal battles, we analyze the Exactech lawsuit, dissecting its nuances and implications within the broader context. 

This analysis aims to uncover the legal strategies that emerge when a product recall results in litigation.

Background of the Exactech Recall

The Exactech lawsuit traces back to a series of critical events that shook the medical community and garnered attention on a global scale. According to, in February 2022, an Exactech recall was initiated. It included more than 140,000 of the company’s knee replacement systems implanted in patients.

In addition, the recall included around 1,500 components of the brand’s ankle replacements. A parallel narrative also unfolded with Exactech Novation and Acumatch hip implants, initially recalled in June 2021 due to packaging issues. 

However, the ordeal expanded further in August 2022, encompassing an additional 40,000 joint replacements susceptible to premature failure. 

These alarming developments precipitated a surge in legal action, with many product liability lawsuits filed against Exactech. Each lawsuit raises the recurring accusation about the defect of the vacuum-sealed bags used for packaging the product. 

These bags allowed oxygen intrusion before implantation, which elevates the risk of degradation and untimely failure of the implants. The result was quite often the need for corrective surgery, merely a few years after implantation.

The backdrop of the lawsuit is thus marked by widespread product recalls, mounting litigation, and the consequential impact on patients’ health.

Repercussions of the Recall

The repercussions of the Exactech recall reverberate across multiple fronts. It casts a shadow of uncertainty over patients, healthcare providers, and the manufacturer’s reputation. Those who received the impacted products find themselves navigating unexpected health risks, potential complications, and the prospect of additional surgeries. 

Healthcare practitioners grapple with the aftermath, facing patient concerns and potential legal ramifications. The recall also tarnishes the company’s reputation, with patient safety concerns challenging its standing in the medical community. 

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had to step in after the recall. It collaborated with international regulatory agencies to assess the risks and effectiveness of all recalled joint devices. The agency focused on Exactech joint replacement devices, manufactured between 2004 to August 2021, and subject to recalls in 2021 and 2022. 

Legal Claims and Allegations Against Exactech

The Exactech lawsuit is a web of legal claims and allegations of the challenges and grievances faced by plaintiffs. Among the claims are assertions of product liability, implicating the company’s accountability for alleged defects that led to patient harm. 

Notably, the lawsuit takes a twist with a whistleblower lawsuit filed by former employees in 2020.  According to Medtruth, this lawsuit alleges that Exactech knowingly supplied faulty implants to beneficiaries of Medicare, Medicaid, and the Department of Veterans Affairs. The multitude of legal claims underscores the complexity of the litigation and the range of concerns raised by those impacted.

Rise of the Exactech MDL 

For affected patients and families it is paramount to understand what is the Exactech MDL.  

The Exactech MDL centralizes the mounting litigation stemming from the alleged product defects. Ordered by the U.S. Judicial Panel on October 7, 2022, this consolidation directs all federally filed Exactech lawsuits to the Eastern District of New York. 

TorHoerman Law notes that multidistrict litigation (MDL) is a legal framework that handles cases involving multiple plaintiffs with comparable injuries from a common product. The said product in this case is Exactech knee, ankle, or hip replacements. 

The MDL process centralizes similar cases in a single court, enhancing efficiency and promoting a systematic approach to litigation proceedings.

Expected Compensation and Damages 

Compensation and damages play a pivotal role in lawsuits, offering a potential avenue of redress for those impacted by the alleged defects. Lawsuit Information Center estimates a settlement range for successful knee implant recall lawsuits, falling between $100,000 to $225,000. 

Similarly, ankle implant lawsuits are projected to yield slightly higher compensation, ranging from $125,000 to $250,000. These estimates draw from comparisons with compensation payouts in other tort cases involving severe knee and ankle injuries. 

The significance of these figures lies in financial restitution and in acknowledging the physical, emotional, and financial toll of the flawed product.


The Exactech lawsuit is one of many lawsuits that have been filed against medical device companies in recent years. These lawsuits highlight the need for companies to be more vigilant about the safety of their products. 

Companies need to be proactive in identifying and addressing potential problems with their products. They also need to be transparent about the risks associated with their products, so that patients can make informed decisions about their care.

The Exactech lawsuit is also a cautionary tale for patients. It reinforces that you need to research before undergoing any medical procedure and ask questions about the risks associated with the devices used. 

Patients should be aware of the signs and symptoms of complications. They should also not hesitate to speak to their doctor if they have any concerns.

This lawsuit is a significant event that has the potential to impact the medical device industry and patient safety. It is important to learn from this lawsuit and to take steps to prevent similar tragedies from happening in the future.